![]() ![]() ![]() Static void Main(string args) => BenchmarkSwitcher.FromTypes(new Span.GetPinnableReference generally gets inlined, a call it makes internally to Unsafe.AsRef was getting blocked from inlining PR dotnet/coreclr#18274 fixed this, enabling the whole operation to be inlined. Replace the contents of Program.cs with the following:.Replace the contents of BlogPostBenchmarks.csproj with the following: In that directory, run dotnet new console. Create a directory named BlogPostBenchmarks. To be able to execute those benchmarks, you can use the following setup: 1. Throughout the post, I’ll include the individual snippets of benchmarks that highlight the particular improvement being discussed. NET libraries, and so as I did in my 2.1 post, I’ll use Benchmark.NET to demonstrate the improvements. Setupīenchmark.NET has become the preeminent tool for doing benchmarking of. ![]() NET Core runtime and core libraries in order to make your apps and services leaner and faster. In this post, we’ll take a tour through some of the many improvements, big and small, that have gone into the. ![]() For me, however, performance is the primary feature that makes me excited to go to work in the morning, and there’s a staggering amount of performance goodness in. NET Core 3.0‘s release now on the horizon, I’m thrilled to have an opportunity to do it again.NET Core 3.0 has a ton to offer, from Windows Forms and WPF, to single-file executables, to async enumerables, to platform intrinsics, to HTTP/2, to fast JSON reading and writing, to assembly unloadability, to enhanced cryptography, and on and on and on… there is a wealth of new functionality to get excited about. NET Core 2.1, a version for which performance was also a significant focus. I enjoyed putting it together so much and received such a positive response to the post that I did it again for. NET Core 2.0, I wrote a blog post exploring some of the many performance improvements that had gone into it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |